On Thursday, May 31, 2022, Arizona lawmakers held an informational hearing for the election watchdog group, True the Vote at the Arizona State Senate building. True the Vote, founded by Catherine Englebrecht, who was accompanied by investigative researcher, Gregg Phillips, is an independent organization that has worked to expose and correct election fraud in the United Sates of America. Founded in 2009, True the Vote has recently taken the political world by storm with the release of a film directed by Dinesh D’Souza called 2000 Mules. The film, which shares the story of True the Votes’ most recent investigation, showed that absentee ballots were trafficked by hundreds of participants from non-government and political organizations to numerous absentee ballot drop-boxes that were installed throughout the country in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The informational hearing itself was True the Votes testimony about election insecurity and how that leads to fraud. Catherine and Gregg shared data from their investigation, stories of fraud, and explained the various ways fraud had occurred. Realizing that the most glaring oddity the 2020 election was the introduction of hundreds of unmanned ballot drop boxes across the country, Catherine Engelbrecht decided to make this the focus of her investigation if only to disprove the drop boxes are what contributed to the election’s theft. She and Gregg Phillips acquired cell phone geospatial and pinging data from five jurisdictions in Georgia, the greater Atlanta area; Arizona, the greater Phoenix area; Michigan, in Wayne County (Detroit); Wisconsin, in Milwaukee County; and Pennsylvania, in Philadelphia County.
To date, True the Vote has hosted an informational hearing for Wisconsin lawmakers, and are responsible for forcing Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to open an investigation into ballot trafficking.
The duo opened with information that proved how fact-checkers paid for my the legacy press (mainstream media) were wrong in saying True the Vote performed an inaccurate and flawed investigation. The point fact-checkers relied heavily on was coaxing the general public to believe that geospatial tracking, or geo-locating, by way of a cell phone is an inaccurate and unreliable method of determining the cell phone user’s physical location. Gregg Phillips addressed this “debunked” inaccuracy. Fact-checkers near and far claim that geospatial tracking on devices cannot accurately determine the exact location of an individual, and profess the technology can only indicate a general area causing fact-checkers to question True the Vote’s findings with condescending vitriol. The reality of the matter is, the fact-checkers could not be more wrong, and their audience thinks this, too. The fact that law enforcement, and even Pelosi’s January 6th Unselect Committee, used geospatial technology to positively identify criminals (or innocent Americans accused of insurrection during the President Trump D.C. rally false-flag riot), causes one to wonder if fact-checkers are ignorant to current geospatial technology applications or if they are boldface lying to the public.
Another fact-check point Gregg and Catherine debunked deals with how they determined who would be the mules. Claiming that geospatial technology is so inaccurate any one of the mules may just be passing by a drop box and not stopping to dump ballots, the fact-checkers ridiculed and scoffed at True the Vote, telling their audience the investigation laughable. The fact-checkers claimed there was no way to determine the patterns in mules’ activity and route were indicative of ballot trafficking. Gregg and Catherine laid out very specific criteria for inclusion to the pool of mules being identified, and they did so with extreme prudence.
As more and more states join the effort to discover and correct the theft of the 2020 election (which is the equivalent of a soft-coup d’état where no shots are fired and no hijacking of dually elected government is declared), and as evidence of fraud, though unacknowledged by the legacy media (mainstream media), continues to build, Americans are wondering more and more when they will see justice materialize as arrests, prosecutions, trials and sentencing. At the completion of the Maricopa County Forensic Audit in September 2021, the people had verifiable proof of fraud, if not a justified lack of confidence in the election’s outcome and security. The evidence of fraud found in Wisconsin, with several state and federal laws broken, justified lawmakers to motion for decertification and law enforcement to make recommendations of accountability. The proof that Dominion Voting Machines can be compromised and the voting data could be manipulated as was the case in Mesa County, Colorado, specifically illustrated the lengths elected election officials would go in subversion of the law. The reasonable question is, why have their been no arrests?
The tribulation of law and democracy caused by the obvious theft of the 2020 election and elected officials choice to ignore or decry the fraud has put America of self-discovery and realization of every step that must be taken in order to regain and maintain our right to self-govern as a constitutional republic. All the steps taken in rectifying the 2020 election and executing accountability for those whom participated in the fraud must follow specific procedures. The order of operations which will correct the wrongs of 2020 and vindicate the defrauded American public are specific and numerous. Simple discovery of evidence does not qualify for prosecution. Many government agencies are involved in finalizing a verdict, and prior to that are the investigations. True the Vote’s ballot trafficking investigation, as remarkably documented in 2000 Mules, was the first step in proving the 2020 elections were stolen. Another step taken: the Arizona informational hearing that took place on May 31, 2022, and laid before a body of lawmakers testimony to prompt government notice. But what is the next step? As with the 2020 Maricopa County Forensic Audit report, the information must be handed over to law enforcement agencies. The next step in the process for True the Vote is to team with law enforcement, to assist any way possible as the story of the 2000 mules that trafficked ballots and the organizations they acquired the ballots from, continues to unfold.
The panel of Arizona senators and congressmen expressed their gratitude for the work True the Vote and local law enforcement have done to expose and rectify 2020. Many of the representatives expressed a found personal conviction to moving forward with election integrity as priority. The audience received Catherine and Gregg as heroes and celebrities of election integrity and America First values. The investigation by True the Vote concerning the theft of the November 2020 election is one of a kind, an unpredicted route in the many paths to justice now materializing. The preface of this investigation and the gravity of information it yields is undeniable. The conclusion of this drama in Arizona is now up to lawmakers and law enforcers. Americans admit more and more everyday that 2020 election may have been stolen, that illegitimate Joe did not win the contest fairly, and more and more Americans are waking up. As they rise, so too does their will, and their will is to hold the criminals accountable for destroying trust in the integrity of our elections, and violating not only the Constitution of these United States of America, but the prerogative of the self-governed.
This article was written by Michael Aaron Casares.